Teach Time Encyclopedia - Learn About Our World
Home Page
Teach Time
Featured Topics

United States
by state

CITYology

Academic Disciplines

Historical Timelines

Themed Timelines

Calendars

Reference Tables

Biographies

How-tos



Friday, September 05, 2008

Highly composite number

A highly composite number is an integer greater than one which has more divisors than any positive integer below it. The first twenty highly composite numbers are

2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 120, 240, 360, 720, 840, 1260, 1680, 2520, 5040, 7560 and 10080

with 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 30, 32, 36, 40, 48, 60, 64 and 72 positive divisors respectively.

There are an infinite number of highly composite numbers. To prove this fact, suppose that n is an arbitrary highly composite number. Then 2n has more divisors than n (2n is a divisor and so are all the divisors of n) and so some number larger than n (and not larger than 2n) must be highly composite as well.

Roughly speaking, the necessary conditions for a number to be a highly composite number are that it has prime factors that are as small as possible, but not too many of the same: e.g. 2×3×3=18 can not be one because 2×2×3=12 has the same number of divisors while being smaller; similarly 2×5=10 cannot be one for the same reason, comparing with 2×3=6; however, with many of the same small prime factors, the number of divisors is relatively small, e.g. 2×2×2=8 is not a highly composite number, it has the same number of divisors as the smaller number 2×3=6.

Highly composite numbers higher than 6 are also abundant numbers. One need only look at the three or four highest divisors of a particular highly composite number to ascertain this fact.

Many of these numbers are used in traditional systems of measurement, and tend to be used in engineering designs, due to their ease of use in calculations involving fractions.

If Q(x) denotes the number of highly composite numbers which are less than or equal to x, then there exist two constants a and b, both bigger than 1, so that

(lnx)aQ(x) ≤ (lnx)b.
Can we get approximations of a and b, and/or a proof of this fact?

See also

External link



Internet Hotel Solutions

Site Sponsors
AC Units
Baltimore Harbor
Boot Camp Grads
Bra Size
Burkittsville
College Hotels
Digital Harbor
Free Cell Phones
Golden Hare Travel
Golf Vacations
Golf Courses
Gourmet
Hair Styles
Hippodrome
iWoman
Lesson Plans
Maryland Hotels
MD Genealogy
Minor League Stuff
Motel Site
Ocean City
OC Real Estate
Old Agers
Office Supplies
Orlando
Pet Friendly Hotel
Room Prices
Savannah, GA
Ski Vacations
South Baltimore
Student Teaching
Travel Sources
University Hotels
Visit Military Bases
Washington, DC

Brought to you by NoChildLeftBehind.com and the Beaches and Towns Network, LLC.